Legal Opinion

Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co. v. Faber

Texas Supreme Court

Decided February 21, 1888No. 2481PublishedCited by 43 opinions

Appeal from Colorado. Tried below before Hon. R. H. Phelps, Special District Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

GAINES, Associate Justice.

—This.case was before this court at the *154Galveston Term, 1885, and is reported in 63 Texas, 344. The judgment theretofore rendered in the lower court was then reversed on the appeal of the present appellant. On the second trial in the District Court the case was submitted to the jury upon the statement of facts prepared and filed for the purposes of the former appeal. We have therefore precisely the same case for adjudication, except in so far as it has been changed by the charge of the court. ¡Now, as before, the charge is assigned, as error; and in this appeal it is…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bomar v. ParkerTexas Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Lehman v. City of BrooklynNew York Supreme Court · 1859
  3. G., H. & S. A. R'y Co. v. FaberTexas Supreme Court · 1885

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Briscoe v. Goodmark Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. ShoemakerTexas Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Paragon General Contractors, Inc. v. Larco Construction Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2007
  4. Kempner v. HuddlestonTexas Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Texas Parks & Wildlife Department v. Dearing, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2007

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API