City of Cave Junction v. State
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtLagesen, J.
*307As we explain, state and local changes in law and policy regarding Oregon's evolving legal marijuana industry have overtaken this declaratory judgment appeal and cross-appeal, such that they no longer present a justiciable controversy. We therefore dismiss both.
The City of Cave Junction filed this declaratory judgment action to resolve a perceived conflict between the city's then-current business licensing requirements and the Oregon Medical Marijuana Act (OMMA). The city's municipal code generally requires businesses operating in the city to obtain a license and further requires licensees to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Couey v. AtkinsOregon Supreme Court · 2015
- United States v. Steve McIntoshCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Barcik v. KubiaczykOregon Supreme Court · 1995
- Reid v. Department of Consumer & Business ServicesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
- State v. WalravenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
3Cited by2 opinions
- Kragt v. Board of ParoleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
- Northwest and Intermountain Power Producers v. PGECourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020