Legal Opinion · Dissent

Miller v. Miller

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 19, 1992No. 91-398Published

1DissentW. Sharp, Judge

I respectfully dissent. The modification of a permanent alimony award is a difficult case to appeal because the reviewing court must give the trial judge’s exercise of discretion a broad range1 and this case is further complicated by two prior appeals, which have a stare decisis or “law of the case” effect. The issue on appeal in this modification case is whether, under the circumstances established at trial, the trial judge abused his discretion by awarding the former wife only a $200 per month increase in her permanent alimony award (for a total of $1,050 per month).

The trial judge found…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Canakaris v. CanakarisSupreme Court of Florida · 1980
  2. Walter v. WalterSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
  3. Dresser v. DresserDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
  4. Hamlet v. HamletSupreme Court of Florida · 1991
  5. Thornton v. ThorntonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API