Legal Opinion

Thornton v. Thornton

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 30, 1983No. 82-812PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

433 So.2d 682 (1983)

Avie Lee THORNTON, Appellant,

v.

Lacy THORNTON, Jr., Appellee.

No. 82-812.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

June 30, 1983.

Carl Jackson Moore, Palatka, for appellant.

Tito S. Smith of Hedstrom & Smith, Palatka, for appellee.

OPINION AND ORDER ON MOTION FOR ATTORNEY FEES

COBB, Judge.

The appellant wife, Avie Thornton, asserts that the trial court erred in awarding her rehabilitative, instead of permanent, alimony. We affirm, based on the facts of this case and the latitude of the trial judge's discretion in this area. See Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Canakaris v. CanakarisSupreme Court of Florida · 1980
  2. Cummings v. CummingsSupreme Court of Florida · 1976
  3. Dresser v. DresserDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
  4. O'Neal v. O'NealDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  5. Campbell v. CampbellDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Doyle v. DoyleDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
  2. Abernethy v. FishkinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
  3. Gieseke v. GiesekeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
  4. Boyer v. BoyerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  5. Thomas v. ThomasDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API