Legal Opinion

Palmer v. Frost

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided July 26, 1912PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Suit upon a note, brought to the Superior Court in New Haven County and tried to the jury before ‘Williams, J.; verdict and judgment for the defendant, and appeal by the plaintiff.

1Opinion of the CourtThayer, J.

The plaintiff, within the statutory time, filed his appeal, assigning for error the court’s refusal to set aside the verdict. He also requested a finding for the purpose of questioning the correctness of the judge’s charge. After the finding had been filed, the plaintiff amended his reasons of appeal by adding thereto two assignments of error founded upon claimed errors in the charge. The original appeal was properly taken to the April term, 1912, of this court held at Bridgeport. The finding was not completed until that term was past. The plaintiff had ten days after the filing of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Harris v. City of AnsoniaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1900
  2. Feltz v. WalkerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1881

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Goldberg v. KrayeskeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
  2. Brown v. New Haven Taxicab Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1919
  3. Farmers State Bank v. ShaferSupreme Court of Kansas · 1926
  4. Land Finance Corporation v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
  5. Maturo v. Aronson, No. 28 67 68 (Apr. 10, 1992)Connecticut Superior Court · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API