Legal Opinion
Sherman v. Citibank (South Dakota), N.A.
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided November 28, 1995Published
1Opinion of the Court
143 N.J. 35 (1995)
668 A.2d 1036
MARC SHERMAN, ON BEHALF OF HIMSELF AND ALL OTHERS AND ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
CITIBANK (SOUTH DAKOTA), N.A., DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Argued February 15, 1995.
Decided November 28, 1995.
Michael D. Donovan, a member of the Pennsylvania bar, argued the cause for appellant (Spector Gadon & Rosen, attorneys; Mr. Donovan and Ann Miller, a member of the Pennsylvania bar, of counsel; Mr. Donovan, Ms. Miller, Paul R. Rosen, and Robert L. Grundlock, Jr., on the briefs).
Louis R. Cohen, a member of the District of…
Also in this document: Dissent · Pollock; Dissent · O'Hern.
2Cases cited86 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-FonsecaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.