Legal Opinion

Paulk v. Roberts

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 20, 1930No. 20272PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.

1. Wliere a citation to appear before the ordinary for a settlement of his accounts, as provided in section 4073 of the Civil Code of 1910, was issued against an administrator, at the instance of parties describing themselves as guardians of designated minor heirs at law of the intestate, no question as to the right of the guardians to receive the minors’ share of the estate was presented, where neither in the proceedings before the ordinary nor in the proceedings on appeal to the superior court was such right of the guardians brought into question. See, in this connection, Hazlehurst v.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Little v. WestSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916
  2. Sturgis v. DavisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1924
  3. New York Life Insurance v. GilmoreCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1929
  4. Burke & Williams v. MackenzieSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  5. Hazelhurst v. MorrisonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1873

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Trust Co. v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
  2. Bailey v. McElroySupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  3. Jernigan v. RadfordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API