Casey v. Chapman
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtCox, C.J.
The primary issue that we decide is the nature of the interest that a successful bidder at a UCC (Uniform Commercial Code) foreclosure sale of a partnership interest acquires at the sale. Governing law generally restricts the rights of an assignee of a partnership interest to profits, not management or voting rights.1 Here, there is no agreement by all the partners of the partnership that either the original assignee of the partnership interest or the successful bidder at a UCC foreclosure sale that pledged collateral was entitled to anything more than profits. Accordingly, we hold that the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Seattle School District No. 1 v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1978
- Berschauer/Phillips Construction Co. v. Seattle School District No. 1Washington Supreme Court · 1994
- Yakima County (West Valley) Fire Protection District No. 12 v. City of YakimaWashington Supreme Court · 1993
- Chemical Bank v. Washington Public Power Supply SystemWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- To-Ro Trade Shows v. CollinsWashington Supreme Court · 2001
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Cannabis Action Coalition v. City of KentCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
- Cannabis Action Coalition v. City Of KentCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
- GMAC Mortgage, LLC v. City of SpokaneCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
- Roy Nielsen HafenUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Utah · 2020
- Tooth Acres LLC v. Hoodstock Ranch LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 2021