Legal Opinion

Bear Springs Forest Products v. Mullins

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 22, 1989No. 86-04114; CA A50688PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButtler, P. J.

Employer seeks review of the Workers’ Compensation Board’s order setting aside its denial of a claim on the ground that it was an improper partial denial.

Claimant injured his knee on the job and filed a claim. Employer responded:

“You filed a claim for workers’ compensation benefits related to an injury sustained to your right knee. Your claim was originally placed into a deferred status, and time loss benefits were paid.
“At this time, I have had an opportunity to review the medical information currently available to me. Based on the current medical information, it does appear that your…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Weyerhaeuser Co. v. WarrilowCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Town of Telluride v. Lot Thirty-Four Venture, L.L.C.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2000
  2. White v. Van PeltColorado Court of Appeals · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API