Legal Opinion
In Re Sulfuric Acid Antitrust Litigation
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided September 24, 2010No. MDL Docket No. 1536. Case No. 03 C 4576PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
DAVID H. COAR, District Judge.
Plaintiffs have filed suit on behalf of a class of sulfuric acid consumers against several producers of the commodity (collectively “Defendants”) for violations of § 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1. Plaintiffs allege that Defendants engaged in anticompetitive behavior by conspiring to reduce the output and fix the price of sulfuric acid in Canada and the United States. In furtherance of the conspiracy, American Defendants GAC Chemical Corporation (“GAC”), 1 Boliden Intertrade Holdings, Inc. (“Boliden”), Pressure Vessel Services,…
2Cases cited94 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Van Dusen v. BarrackSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
89 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Vichi v. Koninklijke Philips ElectronicsCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2014
- In re Broiler Chicken Antitrust Litig.District Court, E.D. Illinois · 2017
- Authenticom, Inc. v. CDK Global, LLC (In re Dealer Mgmt. Sys. Antitrust Litig.)District Court, E.D. Illinois · 2018
- In re National Collegiate Athletic Ass'n Student-Athlete Concussion Injury LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2016
- Med. Ctr. at Elizabeth Place, LLC v. Atrium Health Sys.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.