Legal Opinion

Wilson v. John R. Pinkett, Inc.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided May 28, 1970No. 4878-4884PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FICKLING, Associate Judge.

These appeals are taken from the summary judgment for possession of real estate in favor of appellee, the landlord, against appellants, the tenants. The facts and the issue to be resolved were submitted to the trial court by written stipulation of counsel. They are, in pertinent part:

The [appellants] are tenants in a 216-unit housing project known as “Trenton Terrace.” [They] have lived at Trenton Terrace for substantial period [sic] of time. * * *

Since 1964, the ownership and management of Trenton Terrace changed several times: the property has been managed * * *…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Yvonne C. Edwards v. Nathan HabibCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
  2. Rubenstein v. SwagartDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1950

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Auger v. Tasea Investment Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. Auger v. Tasea Investment Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. Wilson v. John R. Pinkett, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API