Legal Opinion

Nexsen v. Ira Haupt & Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 9, 1964PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMario Pittoni, J.

Defendant, Ira Haupt II, as sole surviving executor of the last will and testament of Ira Haupt, moves to dismiss the complaint on the ground that New York has no jurisdicition over this defendant and on the further ground that plaintiff cannot sue the executor because, prior to the commencement of this action, he failed to comply with the laws of the State of New Jersey.

Defendant is a foreign executor appointed by the Surrogate of Monmouth County, New Jersey, After Ira Haupt’s *630death, June 13, 1963, his executors, on July 2, 1963 procured an order from the Surrogate directing creditors to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Steele v. De LeeuwNew York Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Herrick v. GuildAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Rosenfeld v. Hotel Corp. of AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1967
  2. Gandolfo v. AlfordConnecticut Superior Court · 1975
  3. Mills v. KochisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API