Legal Opinion

Hanover Fire Insurance Company v. Harold W. Holcombe

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided August 5, 1955No. 15406PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUTCHESON, Chief Judge.

Alleging that the vessel Doromar had been insured by the defendant against loss by fire, and that, while the policy was in force, the Doromar burned and sank and became a total loss, plaintiff sued to recover the loss.

The defendant, admitting that, under the terms of the policy, burning and sinking were perils insured against, pleaded as a separate and complete defense an express warranty of seaworthiness and that the vessel was unseaworthy at the time of the commencement of the voyage.

While the answer did not specify wherein the vessel was unseaworthy, the issue…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McAllister v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  2. M'lanahan v. the Universal Insurance CompanySupreme Court of the United States · 1828
  3. Fireman's Fund Ins. v. Globe Nav. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1916
  4. New York & P. R. S. S. Co. v. Ætna Ins.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1913

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Saskatchewan Government Insurance Office v. Spot Pack, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957
  2. Tropical Marine Products, Inc. v. Birmingham Fire Insurance Company of PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957
  3. Tomas Aguirre, Jr., Apolinar Compean, and Wilhelm Seafoods, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Company of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
  4. Lemar Towing Co., Inc. v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Co.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1972
  5. Jim Austin and Aulemic, Inc. v. Servac Shipping Line, Hassan A. Gaafar, Ind., and Lexington Insurance Co., Lexington Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API