Legal Opinion
Alikes v. Griffith
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 21, 2012PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum: Plaintiffs commenced this action against defendant Shari A. Reals, their former real estate agent, and defendants Andrew Griffith, doing business as Andy Griffith Realtor (Griffith), and Re/Max Properties (Re/Max) seeking damages for, inter alia, defendants’ alleged failure to procure a buyer for plaintiffs’ residential property. In their second amended complaint, plaintiffs asserted causes of action for breach of contract, negligent hiring and supervision, fraud and breach of fiduciary duty, and they sought, inter alia, compensatory and punitive damages. Defendants moved for…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ross v. Louise Wise Services, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2007
- Chase v. J.H. Electric of New York, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- R. M. Newell Co. v. RiceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Ventur Group, LLC v. FinnertyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Albert Apartment Corp. v. Corbo Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Karakus v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.District Court, E.D. New York · 2013
- Manson v. Kejo Enterprises, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- Miller v. MillerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020