Legal Opinion

Haddox, Exr. v. Jordan

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided January 22, 1930PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAllread, J.

This action is for the construction of the will of Maud Crutchfield Baker, and particularly of Item Y thereof. The case was brought in the court of common pleas, which rendered a judgment in favor of the contention of Lowell W. Baker and of Bernadine Baker Jordan. An appeal was taken to this court, where considerable evidence was taken.

The case has been presented in this court, and the item involved is as follows:

“Item Y. I hereby give and bequeath the sum of $2500.00 to the following church organizations, all of which are located in the City of Columbus, Franklin County, Ohio:
“A. St.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Adams v. CowenSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  2. Thompson v. BettsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1902
  3. Anderson v. GibsonOhio Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Sommers v. DoersamOhio Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Dixon v. City of CincinnatiOhio Supreme Court · 1846

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re Will of MaurerTuscarawas County Probate Court · 1933
  2. Speakman EstatePennsylvania Orphans' Court, Montgomery County · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API