Legal Opinion

Fowler v. Hate City National Bank

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided November 2, 1891PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Drafts. Acceptance. Indorsement. Pleadings. Before Judge Marshall J. Clarke. Eulton superior court. March, term, 1891.

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment affirmed.

The Hate City National Bank sued the Tolleson Commission Company as drawer and indorser, May E. Eowler doing business under the name and style of Eowler & Company, and E. L. Eowler, as acceptors of *30certain drafts or bills. Mrs. Fowler pleaded the general issue, and a special plea denying that she composed the firm of Fowler & Company. On the trial she offered the following plea : “ If the jury should believe that the firm of Fowler & Co. was composed of this defendant, and and that E. L. Fowler was her agent, then in that event she says that the writing of the name of Fowler…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Snider v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1888
  2. Finney v. CadwalladerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1875
  3. Saulsbury, Respess & Co. v. WeaverSupreme Court of Georgia · 1877
  4. Paris v. MoeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1878
  5. Booher v. WorrillSupreme Court of Georgia · 1871

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Crutchfield v. MartinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  2. Adamson v. ReaginSupreme Court of Georgia · 1915
  3. Lawless v. TempleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API