Legal Opinion

Snider v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided October 17, 1888PublishedCited by 44 opinions

Criminal law. Liquor. Alcohol. Judicial cognizance. Principal and agent. Before Judge Van Epps. City court of Atlanta. June term, 1888. Reported in the decision.

1Opinion of the Court

Simmons, Justice.

Snider was convicted, in two cases, for selling spirituous and intoxicating liquors to minors, and in both cases made motions for a new trial, which were overruled by the court, and he excepted. The proof showed that the defendant sold pure alcohol to two boys on different occasions. The main point argued before us was, that the judge in charging the jury, in both eases, instructed them that alcohol was a spirituous and intoxicating liquor, and that it was not necessary for the State to prove that it was intoxicating; or, in other words, that the court could take judicial…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Myers v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Commonwealth v. BlosMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1874
  3. Plunkett v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
  4. Chambers v. GeorgeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1824
  5. Carmon v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1862

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. First Christian Church v. Realty Investment Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1934
  2. Marks v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
  3. Culbreath v. Kutz Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1927
  4. Cook v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1964
  5. State v. KittelleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1892

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API