Legal Opinion

Blanchard v. Neill

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided July 30, 1914PublishedCited by 4 opinions

On application of complainant for final decree and of defendant for leave to bring suit at law.

1Opinion of the Court

Emery, Y. C.

So far as I have examined the authorities cited by complainant on the right of a party to bring writ of error on a judgment in his own favor, they are all cases where the judgment was rendered, either for the plaintiff-appellant on his claim or the defendant (appellant) on his set-off, and the judgment was less than the amount appellant claimed he was entitled to. In such cases the appellant is clearly "aggrieved” by the judgment in his favor. Parker v. Newland (1841), 1 Hill 87; Ingalls v. Lord (1823), 1 Cow. 240; Johnson v. Jebb (1772), 3 Burr. 1772.

In Capron v. Van Noorden…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Capron v. Van NoordenSupreme Court of the United States · 1804
  2. Ingalls v. LordNew York Supreme Court · 1823

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Automobile Ins. Co. v. Barnes-Manley Wet Wash Laundry Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1948
  2. Riley v. NaylorCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1940
  3. Automobile Ins. Co. v. Barnes-Manley Wet Wash Laundry Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1948
  4. Woods v. RayCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API