Legal Opinion

Henderson v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided September 20, 1988No. 54076PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CRIST, Judge.

Movant appeals the denial of his Rule 27.26 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

Movant was convicted by a jury of assault in the first degree and armed criminal action. He was sentenced to twenty years for assault and fifteen years for armed criminal action, to be served consecutively for a total of thirty-five years. Those convictions were affirmed on appeal by State v. Henderson, 698 S.W.2d 596 (Mo.App.1985).

Movant contends the trial court erred in denying his 27.26 motion without an eviden-tiary hearing on his claims of ineffective assistance of counsel. He claims…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Sanders v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1987
  2. Thomas v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. State v. MorrisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
  4. Tygart v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. State v. HendersonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. OsterlohMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. State v. FergusonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API