Legal Opinion

Moulton v. Dawson

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided October 9, 1964PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holmes

This appeal presents the question of the proper distribution of funds paid into Court in a condemnation case. The State, acting through its Commissioner of Highways, condemned a strip of land across a farm'"in Smith. .County for the Interstate Highway System and paid into Court the sum of $14,072.00 as the appraised damages .to the owners of the property taken, pursuant to Chapter 216, Public Acts of 1959. The title to this property passed under Item 3 of the will of S. S. Dawson, .which is as follows:

*186“All the remainder of my estate both real and personal I will, devise and bequeath to my…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Tate v. TateTennessee Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Jordan v. JordanTennessee Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Jennings v. JenningsTennessee Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Graves v. Illinois Central RailroadTennessee Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Burdick v. GilpinTennessee Supreme Court · 1959

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Walker v. AppleburyTennessee Supreme Court · 1965
  2. United States v. 403.15 Acres of Land, More or LessDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1970
  3. Rutherford County v. Martha WilsonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API