Avrit v. Forest Industries Insurance Exchange
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtYoung, J.
Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment entered after the trial court granted defendants’ motions to dismiss the first amended complaint on the ground that it failed to state ultimate facts sufficient to constitute a claim. ORCP 2lA(8). We determine that the allegations are sufficient and reverse.
The amended complaint contains two alternative claims: either defendant Forest Industries Insurance Exchange (Forest Industries) breached a contract of insurance or defendant Jack Barber Insurance Agency (Barber Insurance) and its agent and employe defendant Linda Barber negligently failed to obtain the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Riggs v. Commercial Mutual InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Transportation Equipment Rentals, Inc. v. Oregon Automobile InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1970
- Yoshida v. Security InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1933
- Bird v. Central Manufacturers Mutual InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1941
- Treit v. Oregon Automobile Insurance Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1972
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Fleming v. United Services Automobile Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000