Legal Opinion

Avrit v. Forest Industries Insurance Exchange

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 6, 1985No. 83-1094-C; CA A31290PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtYoung, J.

Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment entered after the trial court granted defendants’ motions to dismiss the first amended complaint on the ground that it failed to state ultimate facts sufficient to constitute a claim. ORCP 2lA(8). We determine that the allegations are sufficient and reverse.

The amended complaint contains two alternative claims: either defendant Forest Industries Insurance Exchange (Forest Industries) breached a contract of insurance or defendant Jack Barber Insurance Agency (Barber Insurance) and its agent and employe defendant Linda Barber negligently failed to obtain the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Riggs v. Commercial Mutual InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  2. Transportation Equipment Rentals, Inc. v. Oregon Automobile InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Yoshida v. Security InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Bird v. Central Manufacturers Mutual InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Treit v. Oregon Automobile Insurance Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1972

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Fleming v. United Services Automobile Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API