Legal Opinion

Robinson v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided December 14, 1990PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLLAND, Justice:

This appeal presents questions of first impression with respect to Delaware’s Truth in Sentencing Act. The defendant-appellant, Ronald L. Robinson (“Robinson”), filed a motion in the Superior Court to be “resentenced” pursuant to the Truth in Sentencing Act. The Superior Court denied that motion on the basis that the provisions of the Truth in Sentencing Act were prospective only.

In this appeal Robinson contends that the Superior Court erred as a matter of law. Alternatively, Robinson argues that if the Superior Court correctly held that the provisions of the Truth in…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Mistretta v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Williams v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Clements v. FashingSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Schweiker v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. United States v. Mark R. Stewart A/K/A Mark JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Evans v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2005
  2. State v. NguyenCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
  3. Vickers v. DzurendaCourt of Appeals of Nevada · 2018
  4. Anderson v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2023
  5. Boyd v. GarraghtyDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2002

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API