Legal Opinion
Ulrich v. Hausfeld
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 22, 2000PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for defamation, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Cowhey, J.), entered January 20, 1999, as granted those branches of the defendants’ respective motions which were to dismiss the first, second, and sixth causes of action in the amended complaint for failure to state a cause of action.
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of costs.
The Supreme Court properly dismissed the plaintiff’s first and second causes of action alleging…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Williams v. WilliamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
- Park Knoll Associates v. SchmidtNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Martirano v. FrostNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
- Estate of Steinberg v. HarmonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Beshara v. LittleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Ray v. WatnickDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2016
- Bryant v. SilvermanDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
- Knecht v. TusaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- O'Connell v. KersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Carniol v. CarniolAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001