Legal Opinion

In Re Remley

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 20, 1984No. 1087PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROSKY, Judge:

This appeal is from an order involuntarily committing appellant, an 82 year old man, to a state mental hospital for 20 days under 50 P.S. § 7303. Appellant contends that, contrary to the enabling statute, he was committed because he was senile and not because he posed “a clear and present danger of harm to others or to himself.” 50 P.S. 7301(a). 1 We agree and, accordingly, reverse the commitment order.

First, we note that although the commitment period in question has long since expired, we will, nonetheless consider it. We do so in order to maintain appellate oversight of this…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re SchmidtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. In Re Commitment of Ann S.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Janicsko v. PellmanDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1991
  2. In re S.O.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. In re T.T.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  4. In Re Estate of DoroneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. Commonwealth v. GenoveseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API