Legal Opinion
In Re the Marriage of Hamilton
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided March 11, 1993No. 92CA0521PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Chief Judge STERNBERG.
Steffan E. Carroll (father) appeals the denial of his motion to abate or modify child support. We affirm.
Pursuant to a court-approved stipulation entered into in 1990, father was required to pay $700 per month child support to Karen Hamilton (mother). The parties agreed that each then had income of about $50,000 per year.
In 1991, father moved to abate or modify child support, citing his incarceration as a substantial and continuing changed circumstance. At the hearing, the only evidence admitted was a form entitled “California Abstract of Judgment — Prison…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- In Re the Marriage of VetternackSupreme Court of Iowa · 1983
- Ohler v. OhlerNebraska Supreme Court · 1985
- Noddin v. NoddinSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
- Koch v. WilliamsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
- In re R.H.N.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1985
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- People Ex Rel. J.R.T. v. MartinezSupreme Court of Colorado · 2003
- In Re the Marriage of ThurmondSupreme Court of Kansas · 1998
- Department of Revenue v. JacksonSupreme Court of Florida · 2003
- Yerkes v. YerkesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- In re the Marriage of SalbyColorado Court of Appeals · 2005
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.