Legal Opinion

Sigsbee Holding Corp. v. Canavan

Civil Court of the City of New York

Decided June 6, 1963PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArthur Wachtel, J.

The landlord seeks a final order of eviction on the ground that the tenant replaced old, used cabinets, with new ones, and contends that this constitutes waste and a violation of a substantial obligation of the tenancy. The importance of this matter cannot of course be disregarded. Countless tenants would be affected by the decision in this case, for if this were a basis for eviction of tenants the door would be opened to evictions in almost every case where a landlord refuses to permit the tenant to improve the apartment, perhaps even to drive nails into the wall to hang shelves, pictures,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Agate v. . LowenbeinNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  2. Kidd v. DennisonNew York Supreme Court · 1849
  3. Winship v. PittsNew York Court of Chancery · 1831
  4. Andrews v. Day Button Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1892
  5. McDonald v. O'HaraNew York Supreme Court · 1921

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Rumiche Corp. v. EisenreichNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. Madison 52nd Corp. v. OgustCivil Court of the City of New York · 1966
  3. Vittorio Properties, Inc. v. AlprinCivil Court of the City of New York · 1971
  4. Freehold Investments v. RichstoneCivil Court of the City of New York · 1972
  5. Moss v. HirshtrittCivil Court of the City of New York · 1969

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API