Legal Opinion

In Re: Lisa v. Elwell

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided April 2, 2020No. 19-3039Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

19-3039 In re: Lisa V. Elwell UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007 IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURT’S LOCAL RULE 32.1.1. WHEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A PARTY MUST CITE EITHER THE FEDERAL APPENDIX OR AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE (WITH THE NOTATION “SUMMARY ORDER”). A PARTY CITING TO A SUMMARY ORDER MUST SERVE A COPY OF IT ON ANY PARTY NOT REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hubbs v. Suffolk County Sheriff's DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
  2. Dorothy M. Faison v. Tonya LewisNew York Court of Appeals · 2015
  3. Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
  4. Cook v. BieluchConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
  5. Kaczynski v. KaczynskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API