Bill's Printing, Inc. v. Carder
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Dissent
RTert L. Brown, Juhe majority opinion
dissenting. I dissent because The majority opinion essentially nullifies inquiry-notice as this state’s standard for real estate title searches and in doing so overrules more than one hundred years of real estate property law.
The majority holds that a purchaser of land (Bill’s Printing) is a bona-fide purchaser for value without notice even when the chain of title shows that the land he bought was vested in a third party (the Carders) by limited-warranty deed. The majority does so based on a cancellation deed issued by the Land Commissioner to the Carders…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Gaines v. SummersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1887
- Waller v. DansbySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1920
- Dial v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1938
- State Ex Rel. State Tax Commission v. GarciaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
- Massey v. WynneSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.