Legal Opinion

State v. Ligaarden

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 24, 1930PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The defendant was convicted of the crime of engaging in the liquor traffic as a second offense and appeals from the judgment of conviction. The sole question presented for determination is whether chapter 268, Laws 1923 (Supp. §§ 10145b1, et seq.), insofar as it makes it a crime for a person to possess intoxicating liquor, is violative of the constitutional rights of the defendant.

The statute in question provides:

"Sec. 1. The following liquors are hereby declared to be intoxicating and their intoxicating quality shall, by the Courts, be presumed, viz: alcohol, brandy, whiskey, rum, gin, beer,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. LanzaSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. Purity Extract & Tonic Co. v. LynchSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  3. Van Oster v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  4. Crane v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  5. State ex rel. Linde v. TaylorNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1916

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. StofchekSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  2. Menz v. CoyleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1962
  3. State Ex Rel. Agnew v. SchneiderNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Egbert v. City of DunseithNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Timm v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1961

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API