Legal Opinion
Hardenbrook v. Landquist
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided May 3, 1934No. 5133, 5034, 5046PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SPARKS, Circuit Judge.
These cases, by agreement of the parties were consolidated in this court for the purpose of argument. In the discussion we shall refer first to No. 5133, Hardenbrook v. Land-quist.
The questions presented arise out of the court’s ruling with respect to a petition filed by appellees in the District Court, sitting as a court of bankruptcy. The petition was filed pursuant to section 74 of the Bankruptcy Act as amended March 3, 1933 (11 USCA § 202), and alleged that appellees as co-partners and individuals were unable to meet their debts as they matured, and that they desired…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- Bank of Columbia v. OkelySupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- United States v. FisherSupreme Court of the United States · 1805
- Knox v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Gross v. Irving Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Campbell v. Alleghany CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1935
- Continental Illinois Nat. Bank & Trust Co. v. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1934
- Dallas Joint Stock Land Bank v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1936
- Grand Boulevard Inv. Co. v. StraussCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1935
- Thompson v. State of LouisianaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1938
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.