Legal Opinion

Botsford Lumber Co. v. State of Minnesota

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 17, 1933No. 29,279PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILSON, Chief Justice.

Plaintiff appealed from an order sustaining a demurrer to its complaint on the ground that it did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The state is made a defendant under G. S. 1923, § 6033, as amended, 1 Mason, 1927, id. through the agency of its department of rural credit.

The state held a $11,000 mortgage on a 160-acre farm oAvned by John W. Svoboda, who gave a second mortgage to John G. Svoboda for $8,000. The OAvner,, John W. Svoboda, through flagrantly fraudulent representations as to the character and value of the farm, the number and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Merchants' National Bank of Crookston v. StantonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
  2. Wolford v. BaxterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
  3. Coleman ex rel. Smith v. Stearns Manufacturing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1878
  4. Riley v. MitchellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Babich v. Oliver Iron Mining Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
  2. Esbjornsson v. Buffalo Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  3. Glassman v. RadkeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API