Legal Opinion

Trierweiler v. Frankenmuth Mutual Insurance

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided July 12, 1996No. Docket 179443PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTaylor, J.

In this underinsurance-benefits case, defendant appeals as of right an order of the lower court granting summary disposition in favor of plaintiff pursuant to MCR 2.116(C)(10). We reverse and remand for entry of a judgment in favor of defendant.

Plaintiff was a passenger in a farm tractor owned and operated by his father. A speeding, intoxicated driver smashed into the rear of the tractor, causing severe injuries to plaintiff. A civil lawsuit against the driver was settled for the driver’s insurance policy limit of $50,000. Plaintiff was considered an insured person under an automobile…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Auto-Owners Insurance v. ChurchmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Heniser v. Frankenmuth Mutual InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Group Insurance v. CzopekMichigan Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. StarkMichigan Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Rohlman v. Hawkeye-Security InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1993

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Royce v. Citizens InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. Radenbaugh v. Farm Bureau General InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. Rossow v. Brentwood Farms Development, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 2002
  4. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Anna Bevilacqua SpanglerCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2023
  5. Realcomp II, Ltd. v. ACE American InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2014

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API