Legal Opinion

Huizar v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)

Decided August 30, 2000No. 04-96-00837-CRPublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LÓPEZ, Justice.

Previously, we considered Vincent Hui-zar’s appeal wherein he complained that his trial attorney was ineffective, in part, for failing to request a reasonable-doubt instruction during the punishment phase of trial. After examining the totality of the attorney’s performance, we determined that the failure to ask for a reasonable-doubt instruction in the court’s punishment charge did not amount to ineffective assistance of counsel in the absence of authority requiring such an instruction. See Huizar v. State, 966 S.W.2d 702, 706 (Tex.App.—San Antonio 1998), rev’d, 12…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Almanza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  2. Thompson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
  3. Arline v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
  4. Huizar v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
  5. Huizar v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1998

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. De Los Santos v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2006
  2. Tabor v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2002
  3. Darrel Wayne Loge v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2018
  4. Aleister Carlton Bull v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2006
  5. Alfredo Moreno Garcia v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2009

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API