Legal Opinion

Underwriters at Lloyd's Subscribing to Cover Note B1526MACAR1800089 v. TCSL, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided September 30, 2020No. 4:19-cv-02945Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD’S SUBSCRIBING TO COVER NOTE Case No. 19-cv-02945-PJH 8 B1526MACAR1800089, 9 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS 10 v. Re: Dkt. No. 87 11 ABAXIS, INC., et al., 12 Defendants. 13 14 15 Before the court is cross-defendant’s C.H. Robinson Worldwide Inc.’s (“CHR” or 16 “cross-defendant”) motion to dismiss. The matter is fully briefed and suitable for decision 17 without oral argument. Having read the parties’ papers and carefully considered their 18 arguments and the relevant legal authority,…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Safe Air for Everyone v. MeyerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  5. Land v. DollarSupreme Court of the United States · 1947

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API