Legal Opinion

First Nat. Bank of Ville Platte v. Coreil

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided March 7, 1933Published

1Opinion of the Court

MOUTON, Judge.

Plaintiff Bank and third opponent Armand Coreil are each applying for a rehearing in this ease.

The property seized by the bank had been adjudicated at public auction to Mrs. J. M. Coreil, which she refused to take for the reasons stated in our opinion.

The property had been seized as a community asset several months after the adjudication. Two days after the seizure had been effected, the procés verbal of the auction sale-was filed for registry, and in which it appeared that the name of Armand Coreil, third opponent, had been substituted as adjudicatee of the property for that of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Soniat v. WhitmerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1916
  2. First Nat. Bank of Ville Platte v. CoreilLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API