Legal Opinion

First Nat. Bank of Ville Platte v. Coreil

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided January 24, 1933No. 1092PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMouton, J.

An undivided five-sixths in ten arpents of land, with buildings, situated in the town of Ville Platte, were seized, together with some movables, by the sheriff under a fi. fa. issued in execution of a judgment obtained by plaintiff Bank against. J. M. Coreil, and were advertised for salé. Armand Coreil, third opponent, herein obtains an injunction arresting the sale, claiming the ownership of the thing»-, seized; also, rent for the use of a grocery .store located on the land claimed by him, and for attorney’s fees in the sum of $350, for the alleged illegal seizure of his property. .' ......

Ju…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Soniat v. WhitmerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1916
  2. Lapène v. BadeauxSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1884
  3. Washburn v. GreenSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1858
  4. People's Bank v. DavidSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1897
  5. Roussell v. HughesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1925

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. First Nat. Bank of Ville Platte v. CoreilLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1933
  2. Iberville Land & Securities Co. v. HurdleLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API