Legal Opinion
National Treasury Employees Union v. United States
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided July 3, 1996No. Civil Action 96-624 (CRR)PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
CHARLES R. RICHEY, District Judge.
Before the Court in the above-captioned case is the defendant’s Motion to Dismiss the plaintiffs’ challenge to the Line Item Veto Act. As grounds therefor, the defendant argues that the matter is currently nonjusticiable and that the plaintiffs lack standing to sue. Upon careful consideration of the parties’ pleadings, the entire record herein, the arguments of counsel at today’s hearing, and the applicable law, the Court shall grant the defendant’s Motion to Dismiss for lack of standing.
BACKGROUND
On April 9, 1996, the President approved the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Simon v. Eastern Kentucky Welfare Rights OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- National Treasury Employees Union v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
- Safari Club International v. SalazarDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Equal Rights Center v. Post Properties, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Board of Education of Community High School District No. 218 v. Illinois State Board of EducationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1996
- National Treasury Employees Union v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.