Legal Opinion · Concurrence

United States v. Tallon

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided March 29, 1989No. ACM 27128Published

1Concurrence

Chief Judge HODGSON

(concurring in part/dissenting in part):

In United States v. Pope, 3 M.J. 1037 (A.F.C.M.R.1977), aff'd on recon., 3 M.J. 1056 (A.F.C.M.R.1977), we held that the mere presence of an accused at the scene of a crime does not give probable cause for his apprehension. The person being apprehended must be a participant in the crime and not merely a knowing spectator. I fully agree with the majority that the police had probable cause to arrest Samuels when he bolted from the appellant’s car. However, Samuels’ flight and the discovery of drug abuse paraphernalia in the rear section…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. PopeU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1977
  2. United States v. PopeU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API