Legal Opinion

Holman v. Joe Steele Realty, Inc.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided February 28, 1986No. 84-1217PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an appeal from a summary judgment pursuant to Rule 54 (b), Ala.R.Civ.P., in a fraud action in favor of appellees-defendants, Joe Steele Realty of Gadsden, Inc. (hereinafter Steele Realty); David Clokey; and James and Carolyn Minton.1

The Mintons entered into a listing agreement to sell their residence with Betty Batson, a real estate agent employed by Steele Realty. The defendant, David Clokey, is a licensed real estate broker and president of Steele Realty. On June 20, 1983, the plaintiffs-appellants, Ray and Jacqueline Holman, contacted Clokey and were shown the Mintons' home.

Clokey…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Jordan & Sons v. PickettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1884
  2. Marshall v. CrockerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1980
  3. Southern Building & Loan Ass'n v. DinsmoreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  4. Arkel Land Co. v. CagleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  5. White v. LawSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Potter v. First Real Estate Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2002
  2. Padgett v. HughesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  3. AmerUs Life Insurance Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 2008
  4. Vance v. HuffSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  5. Leatherwood, Inc. v. BakerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API