Legal Opinion · Dissent

Mallory S. S. Co. v. Garfield

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided March 1, 1926No. 228Published

1DissentHand, Circuit Judge

I agree that the complaint is badly drawn, but it seems to me good after verdict, if read with section -213 of the New York Civil Practice Act. The fourth article alleges that the cotton was delivered to the Wichita Railroad, which issued a bill of lading to the plaintiff’s agent, and that it was forwarded by the defendant, the Clyde Company, the Meet Corporation, and the New Haven Railroad to the plaintiff at Natick, R. I. Article 6 alleges that the cotton was delivered by the Wichita Railroad to the “Mallory Steamship Company, and/or Clyde Steamship Company as agents” for the Meet…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Kansas City Southern Railway Co. v. CarlSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Cobb v. . KnappNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  3. Marquette, Houghton & Ontonagon Railroad v. KirkwoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
  4. De Remer v. . BrownNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
  5. Horan v. HughesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1903

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API