Legal Opinion

Marquette, Houghton & Ontonagon Railroad v. Kirkwood

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 10, 1880PublishedCited by 25 opinions

Error to Marquette. Case. Defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

Defendants in error sued plaintiffs in error and recovered damages for breakage of two marble soda fountains, taken by the railroad agents at Marquette and carried, one to Ncgaunee, and one to Ishpeming. The fountains *53were packed in New York and forwarded by the New York Central Bailroad, and by that company, as is claimed, turned over at Buffalo to the Lake Superior Transit Company, which is a connecting line. The Transit Company delivered the property at Marquette to the plaintiff in erroi with which it had no business arrangements, but which was the proper carrier from Marquette to tne…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Laughlin v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1871
  2. Marquette, Houghton & Ontonagon Railroad v. LangtonMichigan Supreme Court · 1875

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. MartinSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Skyland Hosiery Co. v. American Railway Express Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  3. Funston v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific R'y Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1883
  4. Fuller v. Ann Arbor RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Philadelphia, Baltimore & Washington Railroad v. DiffendalCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1909

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API