Legal Opinion

Jeremy Paul Golson v. Miguel A. Pineda

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided July 12, 2017No. 16-17485 Non-Argument CalendarUnpublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Jeremy Golson filed a lawsuit against Miguel Pineda and then attempted to serve him with the summons and complaint. Golson filed with the district court a certificate indicating that he had sent Pineda through certified mail a request that Pineda waive service of process. Gol-son later filed a letter from the United States Postal Service, which stated that a copy of the summons and complaint, which Golson had sent to Pineda through certified mail, was delivered but that “[tjhere is no delivery signature on file for this item.” Based on those documents, Golson filed two motions for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Murphy Brothers, Inc. v. Michetti Pipe Stringing, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
  2. David Sapuppo, Theresa Sapuppo v. Allstate Floridian Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2014
  3. Portia Surtain v. Hamlin Terrace FoundationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2015

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Colvin v. DeJoy (MAG+)District Court, M.D. Alabama · 2020
  2. Jacobs v. Land Home Financial Services Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2024
  3. Turner v. DunnDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2025
  4. Williams v. Little (MAG+)District Court, M.D. Alabama · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API