Legal Opinion

Panzieri-Hogan Co. v. Bender

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 16, 1923PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hinman, J.:

This action was brought to recover a balance of $2,011.17, conceded to remain unpaid by defendant to plaintiE upon a con*399tract for building construction. The answer, putting in issue no allegation of the complaint, alleges, by way of defense and counterclaim, that defendant, through plaintiff’s failure to complete the building within the stipulated time, sustained damages through loss of rents to an amount equivalent to the balance unpaid upon the contract. The reply, besides putting in issue most of the material allegations of the counterclaim, avers, as an excuse for the delay in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McGovern v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
  2. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad v. BownsNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  3. Panzieri-Hogan Co. v. BenderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Barnes v. HallCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1940
  2. Almada v. AdministratorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
  3. Curtis Elev. Co., Inc. v. Hampshire HouseNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API