Legal Opinion
United States v. Michael Angelo Meldish
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided November 28, 1983No. Cal. 187, Docket 83-1184PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VAN GRAAFEILAND, Circuit Judge:
Following a jury trial before Judge Ward in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, appellant was convicted of violating 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(h) and 922(a)(6). Section 922(h)(1) makes it unlawful for one who has been convicted of a crime punishable by a term of imprisonment exceeding one year to receive a firearm that has moved in interstate commerce. Section 922(a)(6) provides in pertinent part that it is unlawful for the purchaser of a firearm from a licensed dealer knowingly to make a false written statement intended or likely to…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United States v. BassSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. BatchelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Lewis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Federal Trade Commission v. Sperry & Hutchinson Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Armstrong Paint & Varnish Works v. Nu-Enamel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Sturm v. Harb Development, LLCSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- United States v. ColemanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. Rudolph George StankoCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
- Soto v. Bushmaster Firearms International, LLCSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2019
- Boniella v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.