Walker v. Pomush

The defendant lays as grounds for reversal of the judgment that as matter of law (1) the defendant was not negligent; (2) the plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence; (3) the damages are excessive; (4) the court erred in limiting cross-examination of the plaintiff respecting certain allegations of the complaint; .(5) the plaint*48iff’s counsel persisted in keeping before the jury the fact that the defendant carried indemnity insurance.(1) Upon the bare facts above stated it is manifest that the jury were justified in finding the defendánt negligent. He saw the plaintiff during his whole…