Legal Opinion

Matter of the Estate of Ruggles

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 6, 1936No. Docket No. 41, Calendar No. 38,746PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an appeal by creditors of the Ruggles estate from a portion of the order of the probate court which allowed the second annual account of the testamentary trustees, the appeal being limited to the sole question of the court's approval of the acts of the testamentary trustees in connection with a certain logging contract.

The testamentary trustees received the assets of the estate from themselves as executors upon the express condition that they were to be held in trust for the payment of certain debts before disbursements could be made upon charitable bequests or legacies. Upon the same…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Willis v. . SharpNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  2. Pitkin v. PitkinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1829
  3. Ward v. TinkhamMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Swaine v. HemphillMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Willis v. . SharpNew York Court of Appeals · 1889

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bourne v. Muskegon Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1950
  2. In Re Butterfield EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Detroit Bank & Trust Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1971
  4. Gowthorpe v. PageMichigan Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Bourne v. Muskegon Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API