Legal Opinion

Cady v. Schultz

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided September 19, 1895PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Bill in Equity for an injunction.

1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.

The complainant is engaged in the practice of dentistry, having offices and rooms for that purpose in Providence, in this State, in Baltimore, Maryland, and in Washington in the District of Columbia, and employing assistants to attend to patients at these places. In the prosecution of this business for four years or more he has used as a trade name the words “United States Dental Association,” and has displayed this name, or abbreviations of it, upon signs affixed to his place of business in Providence, and in advertisements and cards widely distributed through Providence, Pawtucket and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Sanders v. JacobMissouri Court of Appeals · 1885
  2. Sanders v. UttMissouri Court of Appeals · 1884

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Shaver v. Heller & Merz Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1901
  2. The Children's Bootery v. SutkerSupreme Court of Florida · 1926
  3. Quaker State Oil Refining Co. v. SteinbergSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  4. Bissell Chilled Plow Works v. T. M. Bissell Plow Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Michigan · 1902
  5. Coalgate Abstract Co. v. Coal County Abstract Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API