Legal Opinion
Carolyn Roberts, Individually v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 20, 1974No. 19-15159PublishedCited by 102 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TRASK, Circuit Judge:
The United States appeals from an order denying its motion for dismissal of the appellees’ complaint. Because the motion raised a close jurisdictional question the District Court certified its order for an interlocutory appeal under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b). The United States filed an application in this court to prosecute that appeal and we granted the application. Upon review of the applicable authorities we conclude that the court erroneously denied the Government’s motion to dismiss.
This is a wrongful death action arising out of the crash of a Flying Tiger Lines cargo…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Richards v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Executive Jet Aviation, Inc. v. City of ClevelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- The PlymouthSupreme Court of the United States · 1866
- Victory Carriers, Inc. v. LawSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- McMahon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by102 opinions
- United States v. United Continental Tuna Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Mohammad Sami v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1979
- Fuji Photo Film Company, Inc., Cross-Appellee v. Shinohara Shoji Kabushiki Kaisha and Graphic MacHinery International, Inc., Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
- Koohi v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Michael B. Gercey v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1976
97 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.