Rask v. State
Court of Appeals of Alaska
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Judge ALLARD,
writing for the Court.
Following a jury trial, Rex Raymond Rask was convicted of felony refusal to submit to a breath test.1 Rask appeals his conviction, arguing that his due process rights were violated because the police gave him objectively misleading advice regarding the criminal nature of his act of refusing to submit to a breath test. ■
For the reasons explained here, we agree with Rask, and we reverse the judgment of the superior court.
Underlying facts and prior proceedings
In the early morning of July 27, 2011, Rask drove his car into a pole near the Cal Worthington…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Missouri v. McNeelySupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Birchfield v. N. Dakota. William Robert BernardSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Copelin v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1983
- Graham v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
- Pena v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Alex Trenton Beltz v. State of Alaska, State of Alaska v. Lesli Renee RichardsonCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2024