Amedee Geothermal Venture I v. Lassen Municipal Utility District
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR., Chief Judge.
Through this action, Plaintiff Amedee Geothermal Venture I (“Plaintiff’), a California Limited Partnership, sought redress from Defendant Lassen Municipal Utility District (“Defendant” or “LMUD”) for damages allegedly arising from Defendant’s reduction of the electrical voltage it supplied Plaintiffs power plant, from 34.5 kv to 12.47 kv. In a prior order, the Court granted Defendant’s motion for summary judgment as to Plaintiffs federal claims brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and declined to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Christiansburg Garment Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Crawford Fitting Co. v. J. T. Gibbons, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Save Our Valley v. Sound TransitCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.